Analysis Argumentation

Frans H. van Eemeren, A. Fransisca (2000:7) Argumentation is an introduction to analizing, evaluating and presenting oral and written argumentation. that is a verbal, social, and rational activity aimed at convincing a reasonable critic of acceptability of a certain opinion by advancing one or more proposition designed to justify that standpoint. (2000:9)

People engage in argumentation to resolving the two difference opinion. the ideas have different position with respect to the other parties ideas. to resolve this problem, they have to appreciate someone's opinion. they can make some kind of agreement to keep the debate well.

the different between explicit and implicit difference of option is a consequence to discuss between two parties. It's not be the case that the second party thinking the opposite way. for example, one party puts forward what they're thinking about and other party express doubt about it. they have to appreciate each other opinion with the acceptable statement.

the difference between positive and negative standpoint is about proposition. there are two-side on opinion each other party. they are proposition and opposition. instead of them, there is neutral position. proposition such as a positive, a negative, or a neutral can be taken. the parties have to committed himself with his position of their ideas.

the difference between standpoints and expression of doubt is often extremely difficult to differentiate. need to know that expression of doubt can also mean as a neutral position. i think this is not a full debate, because neutral position is in the middle of the positive- negative side. we can call them grey-side or non-block side. we cannot claim that expression of doubt is save-side according to them not choose proposition or opposition way. because expression of doubt is someone's way of thinking.